backstory微电影影评

Ⅰ 《孔子》英文的影评

Ofcourse,specialeffectsalonedon'tmakeforasuccessfulfilm,.Inhispreviousoutings,em.,,nottheotherwayaround.Thathasn'tchangedwithTitanic.Thepicture'sspectacleistheship'ssinking,,star-crossedlovers.
Titanicisaromance,anadventure,andathrillerallrolledintoone.Itcontainsmomentsofexuberance,humor,pathos,andtragedy.Intheirownway,thecharactersarealllarger-than-life,butthey'rehumanenough()tocaptureoursympathy.,grandeur,.Totheend,weneverceasecaringaboutRose(KateWinslet)andJack(LeonardoDiCaprio).
,1912intheNorthAtlantic,killing1500ofthe2200onboard.Themoviedoesnotbeginin1912,however--instead,itopensinmoderntimes,withasalvageexpeditionin海上钢琴师英语影评tentonrecoveringsomeoftheship'slong-buriedtreasure.(BillPaxton),"HeartoftheOcean",.,a101-yearoldwoman(GloriaStuart)contactsBrockwithinｆｒｏｍationregardingthejewel.,asurvivorofthetragedy.Brockhasherflownouttohisship.Oncethere,'sill-fatedvoyage.
Thebulkofthefilm--wellover80%ofitsrunningtime--isspentinflashbacks.,.Onboardarethemovie'sthreemaincharacters:Rose,acingfinancialruin;CalHockley(BillyZane),herrich-but-cold-heartedfiancandJackDawson,-classticketinapokergame.WhenJackfirstseesRose,it'sfromafar,大兵小将影评emuchclosertoher.Asthevoyagecontinues,JackandRosegrowmoreintimate,(FrancesFisher)andbreakoffherengagement.But,(KathyBates),-insurmountableobstacle.Then,whencircumstancesintheRose/Cal/Jacktrianglearecomingtoahead,Titanicstrikesanicebergandthe"unsinkable"ship英语影评范文(thattermisatestamenttoman'shubris)beginstogodown.
,:.,itrecesthemalltocardboardcut-outs.InTitanic,,--supporting.Thetwoprotagonists(aswellasCal)s.
Asimportantasthecharactersare,however,it'.Especiallyringthefinalhour,,,picture.ThescenesofTitanicgoi英语影评作文ngunderaresomeofthemostawe-inspiringinanyrecentfilm.Thisisthekindofmoviethatit'.
.-,.Asaresult,ntheoceanfloor.,'ssenseofverisimilitude.
,Cameronhaschosentwooftoday'sfinestyoungactors.LeonardoDiCaprio(Romeo+Juliet),whohasrarelydonebetterwork,hasshedhiscockyimage.Instead,he'--.Meanwhile,KateWinslet,,Hamlet,andJude,,andessaysanappealing,vulnerableRose.--callous,arrogant,,whichincludesKathyBates,BillPaxton,FrancesFisher,BernardHill(asTitanic'scaptain),andDavidWarner(asCal'sno-nonsensemanservant),isflawless.
'sfilms,.-.,ofthesublimeandthespectacular,TitanicrepresentsCameron'smostaccomplishedworktodate.It'--thesethree-plushourpassveryquickly.,itisthemostmemorable,,,BestDirector,BestActor,andBestActress.
??1997JamesBerardinelli

Ⅱ 《闪电狗》英文影评

电影的一点介绍:
For super-dog Bolt, every day is filled with adventure, danger and intrigue - at least until the cameras stop rolling. When the canine star of a hit TV show is accidentally shipped from his Hollywood soundstage to New York City, he begins his biggest adventure yet - a cross-country journey through the real world. Armed only with the delusions that all his amazing feats and powers are real, and with the help of two unlikely traveling companions - a jaded, abandoned housecat named Mittens and TV-obsessed hamster in a plastic ball named Rhino - Bolt discovers he doesn't need superpowers to be a hero.

一篇老外写的感想:
once had a conversation with my college film professor about the movie Monsters, Inc. Like all Pixar films, Monsters was designed to be viewed by kids, yet was also a rewarding tale for alts. But one part of the film always stuck out in my mind: The moment when, in the middle of a wintry wasteland, the monster Sully turns his back on fellow monster Mike to pursue Boo, the human toddler that has become Sully’s ward. Upon my first viewing of the film, this moment was disquieting because, throughout the movie, we had seen the outrageous extent to which Mike was willing to extend his goodwill for the sake of his relationship with Sully. The two had presumably known each other for years, and for Sully to press on without Mike, to give up their friendship to in the pursuit of this girl with whom he’d just recently become acquainted always irked me. What type of message was this film trying to send? Of course, I was young and foolish back then, and my professor swiftly explained to me the error of my ways: Monsters Inc. was not, primarily, a movie about friendship; it was an adoption film. Sully had decided that Boo would be his daughter, and there was something transcendent in that decision, a parental bond that could not be denied even in the light of a friendship forged over years of familiarity and co-existence. Coming from a professor who had adopted a child of his own, this idea struck a particularly meaningful chord in me.

At its core, Disney’s new animated film Bolt is a movie about adoption. Through a clever premise and some great voicework from the leads, it attempts to say something profound about loyalty and devotion, and it mostly succeeds. Bolt (John Travolta) is one of the biggest television stars in the world…only he doesn’t know it. In his own television show, he’s a super-powered dog who fights crime alongside his real-life owner Penny (Miley Cyrus). In reality, he’s a normal dog who’s been tricked into believing his outlandish superhero backstory so that he can maintain a plausible level of emotion while on screen. But when Bolt gets accidentally air-mailed to New York City, he must find his way back to his owner in LA with the help of a plucky cat, Mittens (played by Susie Essman), and an overenthusiastic hamster (Mark Walton). Along the way, he’ll struggle with the apparent loss of his powers and discover the true level of his devotion to Penny (i.e. his “person”).

Virtually all the supporting characters in Bolt are completely one-note, from the on-the-nose parody of Penny’s Hollywood agent (Greg Germann) to Bolt’s director (played characteristically and deliciously by James Lipton). Accordingly, the degree to which they are amusing is inversely related with the amount of time they are on screen (the Hamster character, Rhino, wore particularly thin on my nerves as the film went on). The only reason the movie works as a whole is e to the good work of John Travolta as Bolt and Susie Essman and Mittens. Travolta, whose career has spiked up and down dramatically ever since Pulp Fiction, acquits himself surprisingly well as the titular hero. Although I was expecting to hear a younger voice come out of Bolt’s mouth, Travolta (who is 54) was able to convey a pathos that fit Bolt’s arc rather well, especially as the movie builds to an emotional climax. Meanwhile, Essman’s Mittens is hilarious as the “straight man” to Bold’s deluded self, yet she also proves that there’s slightly more depth and tragedy to her character than you would think. Essman really helps to hold the film together and her New York accent is as impeccable as it is appropriate for her character.

There’s a lot to like in Bolt, which is why I’d encourage anyone to see it. The over-the-top opening chase sequence is wonderful fun, and the film’s overarching message is utterly wholesome. There is also the matter of the pigeons in this film, who are unbelievably amusing at providing the local flavor of each region that Bolt travels through (they are the character equivalent of the penguins in the Madagascar series, perhaps one of the only amusing elements from those films). Yet while Bolt reaches for the greatness of a Pixar film, and comes quite close to that standard, it ultimately relies too much on easy jokes and shallow characters to attain it. It’s a great film for the family, or even for a date, but I don’t think it’s one I’ll be revisiting very often.

[I should also mention that I saw the film in Digital 3D and while I was wowed by the opening set piece, the rest of the film didn't really use 3D very noticeably (perhaps that was the point?). Occasionally, it served to play with the audience's perception of depth of field fairly effectively, but aside from that, I didn't really notice the 3D at all. This is hopefully the way that 3D will be used in the future, not drawing attention to itself, but subtly enhancing what you see on screen. Still, while I'd wholeheartedly recommend the 3D version, I definitely think the film would probably be just as enjoyable in 2D.]

Despite my qualms, Bolt still manages to cross a threshold of emotional involvement that any Disney film should envy. There’s a moment in the film when Bolt must decide between his friends and his “person”. But even as he makes his choice, we know that it’s a decision that’s already been woven into his being. Bolt’s loyalty is that of a child for its parent, a loyalty that goes beyond mere blood ties. It is an emotion that is as primal as it is all-surpassing. And the way it is ultimately resolved is guaranteed to tug at the heartstrings of even the most jaded moviegoer. In the end, that may be Bolt’s greatest super power: As an animated dog, he somehow found a way to touch human hearts.

楼主可以从中摘录几句.

Ⅲ 电影狂暴飞车3D里最后尼古拉斯凯奇和会计师一起开车回地狱时那段插曲叫什么名字。是个男的唱的。

Alive - meat loaf
最后一起开会地狱

Ⅳ 求电影狂暴飞车配乐曲目详单

1.Raise a little hell -- Trooper >
2.Wrong Path
3.Final hour blues -- Pennybank Tunes>
4.Fuck the pain away -- Peaches
5.Laser love -- T.Rex
6.Sandman -- Robbyn Kirmsse>
7.I like to rock —— April Wine
8.You want the candy -- The Raveonettes
9.The answer -- UNKLE
10.All things bright and beautiful （Traditional）
11.That's the way I like it -- Easy Action
12.Stone in my hand -- Everlast
13.Amazing Grace （Traditional）
14.Alive -- Mark Campbell>
15.Drive Angry -- Weston Cage>

Ⅳ 你认为电影《刺客信条》好看吗

我认为正是因为主创团队选择忠实于游戏世界和叙事风格而展开的新故事给予了其独特的质感，在我眼里肯定是好看但是有些游戏原作的叙事风格放进电影里来很容易叙事混乱，加上导演的个人风格混杂进来就会造成很烂的错觉（故事也还没完全展开，只是√标题真正含义），我和刺客教条之父来自相同的专业背景，他也认可这部电影（那些声称玩过不认可这片的就没有悟透过） 像我 我一直想要个在现代的刺客教条，在现代践行无物为真，诸行皆可才是最高造诣（电影采取的让现代主角觉醒方式就是让他被祖先的过去所改变，肩负对抗现代圣殿的重任反抗专制压迫）

所以我想说这部电影对游戏改编电影是有新意的尝试和进步，可它无法兼顾主流观众的口味就不如拍成剧集，免得砸牌子。

FormeAssassin'',torelivethelivesof 4-6 ancestorsandtorelive only thepivotalmomentsinhistory,.... order inthemodernday.

Ⅵ 电影 狂暴飞车3D中1小时13分钟时候的歌曲名字。就是那男的开个油罐车帮尼古拉斯凯奇解围时候的歌曲。

1. Full Frontal Shotgun (1:04)
2. Milton (2:02)
3. The Accountant (2:20)
4. Palomar Motel (1:19)
5. The Iron Godkiller (1:27)
6. Burning Memories (2:03)
7. Checking Out The Hard Way (1:56)
8. Piper Rides Shotgun (1:37)
9. The Bridge (3:09)
10. Good Little Follower (1:39)
11. Let’s Go For A Ride (2:00)
12. Eyes Wide (1:01)
13. Revolutions Per Minute (2:47)
14. I Never Get Curious (1:43)
15. A Door That Can’t Be Closed (1:04)
16. Road Raging (1:50)
17. Webster (1:06)
18. Milton’s Backstory (1:26)
19. All You See (2:14)
20. Mass vs. Acceleration (2:14)
21. Chevelle (1:13)
22. Walking Contradiction (1:18)
23. Roadblock (2:02)
24. G-Man (1:20)
25. Redline (2:40)
26. Say Thank You Or She Dies (4:57)
27. Not Of This Earth (4:31)
28. Grandaddy (3:46)
29. I’ll Have That Beer (1:38) 这是所有的歌曲 具体是哪个其实我也不知道 你可以每一个都听下 里面的歌曲个人觉得都不错 谢谢

Ⅶ 英文介绍电影加感想

The Shawshank Redemption is directed by Frank Darabont and starred by Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman。

《肖申克的救赎》由弗兰克•达拉邦特执导，蒂姆•罗宾斯、摩根•弗里曼等主演。

The film tells the story of Andy，the banker，who is accused of shooting his wife and lover。Andy is sentenced to life imprisonment，which means he will spend the rest of his life in Shawshank prison。

影片讲述了银行家安迪被指控枪杀了妻子及其情人，安迪被判无期徒刑，这意味着他将在肖申克监狱中渡过余生。

Rhett was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder in 1927，with several unsuccessful Paroles。He became an authority figure in Shawshank prison。

瑞德1927年因谋杀罪被判无期徒刑，数次假释都未获成功。他成为了肖申克监狱中的“权威人物”。

For a long time，Andy didn't get in touch with anyone。While everyone complained，he took a leisurely walk in the yard，just like in the park。

很长时间以来，安迪不和任何人接触，在大家抱怨的同时，他在院子里很悠闲地散步，就像在公园里一样。

The arrival of a young inmate broke Andy's peaceful prison life: the inmate had heard Andy's case before while serving in another prison，and he knew who was the murderer。

一个年轻犯人的到来打破了安迪平静的狱中生活：这个犯人以前在另一所监狱服刑时听到过安迪的案子，他知道谁是真凶。

Movie meaning:

影片含义：

全片透过监狱这一强制剥夺自由、高度强调纪律的特殊背景来展现作为个体的人对“时间流逝、环境改造”的恐惧。

Through the special background of forced deprivation of liberty and high emphasis on discipline，the whole film shows the fear of time passing and environmental transformation of the indivial。

(7)backstory微电影影评扩展阅读

《肖申克的救赎》主角

1、安迪·杜佛兰

年轻银行家，误成杀妻凶手进入肖申克监狱。后在监狱待了19年后，在监狱中办监狱图书室，还利用自己的知识帮助大家打点自己的财务，典狱长发现他的理财特长后让他帮助自己清洗黑钱做假帐。

2、艾利斯·波德·瑞德

肖申克监狱囚犯之一，狱中交易商，与安迪结为好友在狱中数次为安迪提供凿子之类的小工具。曾经数度申请假释均被驳回，安迪逃狱后，终于获得假释并且与老友重逢。

Ⅷ 请各位英语高手用英文帮我写四篇电影影评

1. 虎胆龙威（DIE HARD)：

What makes Die Hard the all-time classic it has rightfully become was the lack of extravagance and fantasy: there were no decades-old war grudges, no jungle action, no superhuman powers and only the occasional physics-defying stunts we are usually overloaded with. The characters in this film were regular people, with regular jobs and regular attitudes, confronted with an extraordinary situation, responding as most regular people would, by doing things which go beyond what they would "regularly" consider. Each character's backstory is one that could easily be ours if we were born in their shoes, and we all know at least one or two people like someone from the film. These are the people we live with, work with, and interact with, and the film captured them perfectly. This realism makes it very easy for the audience to believe that it too could have been caught at that party and had to face the situation.

Die Hard took the action genre in a new direction, adding a human touch and bit of reluctance to their invulnerability, while also showing them (as Spider Man would do so as well later on) as people who are much better at making others' personal lives work out than they are with their own.

Even if you haven't seen Die Hard, you've seen its legacy in many other films since. The formula was a brilliant one, and this was its birth.

2. 铁血战士（PREDATOR)：

Huge guns, Huge tough guys, macho dialogue, funny banter, One liners and an Alien. John McTiernan's 1987 classic 'Predator' is a action fans dream and a true guys film. What's not to like? Quick setup. Dutch (Arnold Schwarzenegger) and his team of bad-asses are sent to the South American jungles to rescue a group of POW's from an enemy hideout. Simple enough, but that's before they start getting picked off by a hunter from another planet. The rest of the movie relies on suspense, an over the top macho atmosphere and a entertaining team.

John McTiernan's style of creating a believable atmosphere shines out through the characters and dialogue. Every member of the rescue team is memorable and likable e to their humorous dialogue and over the top macho-ism. Dutch chomping on cigars, Blain wielding a mini gun, Mac shaving with his own sweat and Billy's huge knife are all examples of the manliness portrayed in the film.

The Predator is great in its first portrayal, brought to life thanks to Stan Winston's incredibly lifelike effect. His gadgets and weaponry stay cool and interesting right until the end. One of the things that make the film interesting is watching the team come up with new ways to kill this creature that's picking them off like flies.

The film is filled with memorable quotes and scenes that will linger in your mind any time you think of masculinity. Any fan of action or Schwarzenegger will know this is a must see and one of the quintessential 80's flicks.

3. 青春年少（RUSHMORE）：

Rushmore is an extremely well written movie about obsessive love.

The acting is a quality of Rushmore that contributes greatly to its appeal. I've seen a lot of Bill Murray movies, an I've always had a high opinion of him. Saying that Bill Murray is good in a movie usually means that he was really funny (which, with a few exceptions, goes without saying). In this film, though, there is something more to his performance. With his facial expressions alone capturing the tortured soul of Mr. Blume accompanied by his impeccable comic timing, Murray is plainly terrific. Jason Schwartzman is also outstanding as Max, although his appearance shows more years than the mere 15 he is supposed to be. Olivia Williams is subtle and extremely effective as the British object of affection. Finally, in a key role as Max's chapel partner, Dirk Calloway, Mason Gamble (from Dennis the Menace), convey's his bitterness and anger with such acuity and humor that one can't imagine that there he is actually acting in front of a camera.

The humor of Rushmore is so delightfully offbeat, hilarity sometimes being found in such places as silent pauses with the camera directed right at the actor's face, that it might not be for every taste (but be sure to give it a try first). In fact, everything about this movie is different. I've seen this film twice and from the surreal use of really vivid colors to the quick-paced direction by the obviously very talented Wes Anderson, it seems destined to have cult status in the future. Finally, I would like to mention the soundtrack, a compilation of primarily British "invasion" rock (along with a brilliant original score), for it almost perfectly captures the spirit and life of this amazing achievement.

4. 死亡证据（DEATH PROOF)：

Like classic directors invented the western imagery, Tarantino recreates a world of vinyl jukebox, groovy cars and adventurer-girls that only exists as an illusion. The girls, low-middle class , behaves with an independence that many housewives would envy and they are clearly inspired in the Russ Meyer pictures. But they are real, even one of the girls is credited as 'herself'.

The famous Tarantino's dialogs are a hit-and miss in this one. Sometimes they seem forced, others they flow naturally, the sheer pleasure of conversation, and they help to make the movie a lightweight experience, that could keep on running. I said that the world exists only as an illusion, but that doesn't apply to the objects (the cars, the jukebox). Tarantino is like an antiquarian that doesn't want to see his beloved treasures getting st.

Did I mention the virtuosity? The cinematography is ostentatious and generous, showing colorful scenarios. They don't try to be pervasive, on the contrary it is a "Hey, look what I'm doing" way all the time, and it works.

My only complaint is that I'm sure I'm gonna see a few semi-obscure movies from the 70s and think: "I've seen this before somewhere..." It is time for QT to do something that could be described as 'original'. Only Pulp Fiction fits in that category.

Ⅸ 电影霍比特人英文简介及感想,中文翻译

This movie is FUCKING AMAZING! I was getting really worried before going to see it because of some negative reviews, but I was quite exciting in another way cause I had have read the book since I was a freshman. If you loved the Lord of the Rings movies, especially the extended editions, then you will love The Hobbit too whatever the book or the movice.(开头...blablabla...)

My college friend introced the late great Mr J.R.R. Tolkien to me after I watched the Lord of the Rings movies , at a time when I had an insatiable appetite for movices or literature of the magic.I'm a HUGE fan, but not a "purist", and saw each of the live action films several times in the theaters. (自己和霍比特人的渊源)

I've been waiting for The Hobbit since 2003, and have been following the proction online. When it was announced 7 months ago that Peter Jackson was splitting the story into 3 films (after already completing proction on the 2-film adaptation), my heart sank. It's not that I was opposed to turning The Hobbit into a trilogy (despite that it's meant to be a children's story and not an epic), but I just didn't think there was enough story and it seemed like a cash grab that would probably destroy the pacing. But, Peter Jackson hasn't let me down before and so I held out hope. In fact the more I heard him talk about giving the dwarves a bit more character development and backstory and adding in all the stuff about the White Council, I began to look forward to it.

When a couple weeks ago reviews starting coming in saying that, as I had first feared, the movie dragged and the pacing was terrible, I prepared myself for disappointment. Even though hardcore fans on messageboards like theonering.net who had seen the movie early kept saying it was terrific, the negative reviews from professional critics kept coming in. The movie is "bloated" and "ll" and "misses the point", they said. And so I was VERY nervous going to see the movie.（电影前期准备，以及评论）

（下面是观影感想）...
I'm pleased to say that not only is the movie incredible, but it's on par with the Lord of the Rings movies. I haven't felt this way about a movie since Fellowship of the Ring 10 years ago. I haven't been able to stop thinking about it all night, and I can't wait till I can go see it again. I sat in the theater for nearly three hours with the biggest grin on my face the entire time. The movie didn't feel bloated or stretched thin to me. I was worried that there would be all these scenes that went on too long or belonged on the cutting room floor, but I can't think of anything I would have left out. It was like watching the book acted out on the screen in front of me with really great acting, music, and proction values.

The cinematography has really improved in the last 10 years! Wow this movie is beautifully shot! Howard Shore's music is once again great, though there are some little deletions and changes from the Original Soundtrack -- the only one that really bugged me though was the use of the Nazgul theme over Thorin fighting Azog. There was better music there in the Original Soundtrack and changing it was a horrible decision.

I love the added stuff with the White Council/Necromancer. It's all there in Tolkien's appendices and in "Unfinished Tales", and (blasphemy for saying so) depending on how this continues to play out over the next two movies I may end up liking this even better than the book! Either the next film or the one after that will have the Battle of Dol Golr and, from what I've heard, we will see Gandalf, Saruman, Radagast, and Galadriel battling werewolves and giant spiders as they try to drive out the Necromancer. I can just imagine how awesome that will be if Peter Jackson pulls it off!

And, yes, this felt to me like a complete movie. One of the reasons I originally hated the idea of a trilogy was I expected to feel short changed by only seeing a small fraction of the story and then having to wait another year. But I felt like there was plenty of story and they got into plenty of adventures.

My only nitpicks are few: I liked the design of the Great Goblin but I thought he acted way too cartoony. My other is there were a couple times where Bilbo and the dwarves fell from a height of like 500 feet and just got back up. They would have been killed. I also thought the character Azog was fine, but why did he have to be all CGI? Why couldn't it have been an actor in makeup like Lurtz in Fellowship of the Ring? Those are really my only nitpicks though.

As I sat in the theater I had a feeling like this is one of the best filmgoing experiences I've ever had. I had the same feeling watching Lord of the Rings. As someone who originally hated the idea of making this into a trilogy, now I say bring it on!!!

最后老师最爱：讲些什么什么电影教会我们什么

The movie is not only Bilbo's advention but also show us how to live.None of us knows what might happen even the next minute, yet still we go forward. Because Bilbo trust. Because he have Faith.He figured out that a meaningful life is not about being rich, being corfatable in his cave. It is about being real, being humble, being able to share ourselves and touch the lives of others. It is only then that we could have a full, happy and contented life.